A practical comparison of file size, quality, and browser support
Ready to convert?
Convert Images Free -->Read more: WebP vs JPG: Which Should You Use?
WebP and JPG are the two most common image formats on the web today. Both handle photographs well, but they differ significantly in compression efficiency, feature support, and compatibility. This guide breaks down the real-world differences so you can make the right choice for your images.
At equivalent visual quality, WebP files are consistently 25-35% smaller than JPG. A 500 KB JPG photo typically becomes 325-375 KB as a WebP at the same perceived quality. For a page with 10 images, that difference adds up to several hundred kilobytes of saved bandwidth.
This size advantage comes from WebP's more modern compression algorithm. JPG uses the Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT), which was state of the art in 1992. WebP uses a prediction-based approach derived from the VP8 video codec, which is simply more efficient at encoding photographic detail.
At quality settings above 75, most people cannot tell a WebP image from a JPG in side-by-side comparisons. Both formats are lossy by default, meaning they discard some image data to achieve smaller files. The difference is that WebP discards less data for the same file size, or achieves the same quality at a smaller size.
JPG quality 85 and WebP quality 80 produce roughly comparable visual results, but the WebP file will be noticeably smaller.
| Feature | WebP | JPG |
|---|---|---|
| Lossy compression | Yes | Yes |
| Lossless compression | Yes | No |
| Transparency (alpha) | Yes | No |
| Animation | Yes | No |
| Browser support | 97%+ (all modern) | 100% |
| Email client support | Limited | Universal |
| Metadata (EXIF) | Yes | Yes |
| Max dimensions | 16383 x 16383 | 65535 x 65535 |
All modern browsers support WebP: Chrome (since 2014), Firefox (since 2019), Edge (since 2018), Safari (since version 14 in 2020), and Opera. Together these cover over 97% of global web users. Internet Explorer 11 was the last major holdout, and Microsoft discontinued it in 2022.
If you still need to support very old browsers, you can use the HTML <picture> element to serve WebP with a JPG fallback. But for most sites in 2026, WebP-only is perfectly safe.
For web use, yes. WebP produces files 25-35% smaller than JPG at equivalent visual quality, and it supports transparency and animation. The only scenario where JPG is the better choice is when you need universal compatibility with legacy software, email clients, or print workflows.
All modern browsers support WebP, covering over 97% of web users globally. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, and Opera all render WebP natively. The last significant browser without WebP support was Internet Explorer, which was discontinued in 2022.
Yes. WebP supports alpha channel transparency in both lossy and lossless modes. This makes it a strong alternative to PNG for images that need transparent backgrounds, with the added benefit of much smaller file sizes.
For images served on the web, converting to WebP is almost always worthwhile. The 25-35% file size reduction improves page load speed, reduces bandwidth costs, and helps with search engine rankings. Keep your original JPGs as master files, and serve WebP versions on your website. For email and document attachments, stick with JPG for now.